5986
|
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gcb
Glob Change Biol.
2023;29:5986–5987.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Received: 25 June 2023
|
Accepted: 31 July 2023
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16921
L E T T E R T O T H E E D I T O R
The robust concept of mineral- associated organic matter
saturation: A letter to Begill et al., 2023
Sequestration of persistent soil organic carbon (SOC) is seen as a cost-
effective and scalable CO
2
removal strategy, so it is critical to under-
stand whether soils have a finite capacity to store mineral- associated
organic C (MAOC)— on average more persistent than particulate
organic C (POC). Since the conceptualization of “soil C saturation”
around the turn of the century, many have embraced it and studied
its upper limits, found to vary up to 78– 86 g C kg
−1
fine fraction (Feng
et al.,
; Georgiou et al.,
), its controls, and effects on SOC
dynamics (e.g., Cotrufo et al.,
; Six et al.,
; Sokol et al.,
Using soils from the German Agricultural Soil Inventory, Begill
et al. (
) have questioned the concept of soil C saturation. They
posit that the available mineral surface area is not a physical limitation
on MAOC accumulation because organic matter (OM) can bind to other
OM bonded to minerals, in unlimited “skyscraper- like” structures. We
challenge their conclusion here based on the following points.
1. Physical fractionation method: The fine fraction most likely
contains particulate organic matter (POM)
The conceptual definitions of fractions do not fully correspond to
their procedural definitions (Leuthold et al.,
). Begill et al. dis-
persed aggregates using sonication, which is known to disintegrate
POM and disperse OM in solution even at energies below 100 kJ
(Leuthold et al.,
). They also used flocculant to precipitate
the OM in solution (
<
50
μ
m) as mineral- associated OM (MAOM).
To discount POM contamination, they noted the consistent C- to-
nitrogen (N) ratio (10.7) of their fine fractions (
Figure
), assuming
POM has a higher C:N than that. However, the latter has been con-
tradicted by observations of C:N ratios of 10– 12 for fine POM (Six
et al.,
). Furthermore, since they selected soils with C:N
<
13,
several may have POM C:N ≤ 10.7 and, for soils with C:N ratios
of 10.7– 13, a minor shift from the linear relation would indicate
POM contamination. That is what their data show; all fine fractions
with high C contents have C:N
>
10.7 (
Figure
), suggesting POM
contamination.
Potential overestimation of MAOC by Begill et al. (
) is further
suggested by slightly higher contributions of MAOC to SOC than other
studies, with average values of 86% for cropland and 72% for grassland,
versus global and continental- scale averages of 72%– 79% for croplands
and 70%– 72% for grasslands (Lugato et al.,
; Sokol et al.,
).
2. Dominance of Gleysols among high organic carbon soils
Gleysols are fundamentally different from mineral soils for which
the C saturation concept was defined. They accumulate C because
of prevalent anoxic conditions and not necessarily through physi-
cochemical stabilization (Six et al.,
). For the POM- rich Gleys-
ols, POM contamination to the fine fraction would certainly be
expected. Gleysols should therefore be avoided when assessing
MAOC saturation.
This article is a Letter to the Editor by Begill et al.,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16804
. See also response to this letter by Poeplau et al.,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16920
F I G U R E 1
(a) Reproduction of carbon (C) versus nitrogen (N) in the fine fraction samples from Begill et al. (
, figure 5). Ratios of C:N
for the high C samples were extracted using
plotdigitizer
(
https://plotd igiti zer.com/app
) and are reported in red. (b) Second- order polynomial
versus linear fit of the relationship between soil organic carbon (SOC) and mineral- associated organic carbon (MAOC) for European
croplands (CR), forest (FR), and grassland (GR) soils. Data are from Cotrufo et al. (
) and Lugato et al. (
). Regression models were
tested using the
anova
function of R software version 4.0.5 (MAOM_vs_SOC_model_regression.r), available at
. [Colour figure can be viewed at
|
5987
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
3. Support for previous report of C saturation
Begill et al. (
) questioned our observation of MAOC saturation
in European grasslands and forests (Cotrufo et al.,
) because
there were no soils with
>
47 g MAOC kg
−1
soil. The samples were
selected to represent the distribution of total SOC and soil texture
observed across over
∼
20,000 European sampling locations (Lugato
et al.,
). Thus, that all the soils had
<
47 g MAOC kg
−1
soil was a
finding rather than the result of a biased selection.
While we recognize that our data were sparser for higher SOC
soils, there is adequate evidence for saturation behavior (
Figure
) for
all land uses: polynomial fits of the MAOC- to- SOC relationship were
statistically better and different from linear fits at
p
<
.001 (
Figure
Observing the MAOC- to- SOC relationships presented by Begill
et al. (figure 3), it appears that a second- order polynomial might have
fit better than the linear relationships for the low and medium fine
fraction soils (figure 3a,b), suggesting a saturation behavior, while
the linear relationship for the high fine fraction soils (figure 3c), may
be driven by a few samples with very high SOC (possibly Gleysols).
4. Is organic matter associated with organic matter bonded to
minerals equally stable?
Rather than challenging the C saturation concept, the growing evi-
dence for a patchy “skyscraper” model for what we define as MAOC
and the range in
14
), should serve as
a reminder that separating a MAOC fraction by size and/or density
is not necessarily sufficient to identify the persistent SOC pool. It
is well known that MAOM can exchange with dissolved OM (Kle-
ber et al.,
), and some process- based models already represent
two MAOM pools: a dynamic MAOM and a more stable MAOM. Yet,
data are needed to calibrate and verify these models. Identifying the
most effective and scalable method to separate and characterize the
dynamic exchangeable (possibly OM bound to OM) from the stable
MAOM (possibly OM bound to minerals) is critical to better inform
the broad and active field of soil C sequestration.
CONFLIC T OF INTEREST STATEMENT
MFC discloses to be a cofounder of Cquester Analytics LLC. The au-
thors have no conflict of interests.
DATA AVAIL ABILIT Y STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from
Zenodo at
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8227702
.
M. Francesca Cotrufo
Jocelyn M. Lavallee
Johan Six
Emanuele Lugato
1
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State
University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
2
Environmental Defense Fund, New York, New York, USA
3
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
4
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
Correspondence
M. Francesca Cotrufo, Department of Soil and Crop
Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526,
USA.
Email:
francesca.cotrufo@colostate.edu
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6191-8953
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3028-7087
Johan Six
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-4185
Emanuele Lugato
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-352X
REFERENCES
Begill, N., Don, A., & Poeplau, C. (2023). No detectable upper limit of
mineral- associated organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils.
Global Change Biology
,
29
, 4662– 4669.
Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J., & Lugato, E. (2019).
Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral- associated
organic matter.
Nature Geoscience
,
12
, 989– 994.
Feng, W., Xu, M., Fan, M., Malhi, S. S., Schoenau, J. J., Six, J., & Plante, A.
F. (2014). Testing for soil carbon saturation behavior in agricultural
soils receiving long- term manure amendments.
Canadian Journal of
Soil Science
,
94
, 281– 294.
Georgiou, K., Jackson, R. B., Vindušková, O., Abramoff, R. Z., Ahlström, A.,
Feng, W., Harden, J. W., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Polley, H. W., Soong, J. L.,
Riley, W. J., & Torn, M. S. (2022). Global stocks and capacity of mineral-
associated soil organic carbon.
Nature Communications
,
13
, 3797.
Kleber, M., Bourg, I. C., Coward, E. K., Hansel, C. M., Myneni, S. B., &
Nunan, N. (2021). Dynamic interactions at the mineral– organic
matter interface.
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
,
2
, 402– 421.
Leuthold, S. J., Haddix, M. L., Lavallee, J., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2022). Physical
fractionation techniques. In
Reference module in Earth systems and
environmental sciences
. Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0-
Lugato, E., Lavallee, J. M., Haddix, M. L., Panagos, P., & Cotrufo, M. F.
(2021). Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-
associated soil organic matter.
Nature Geoscience
,
14
, 295– 300.
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002). Stabilization mech-
anisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C- saturation of soils.
Plant and Soil
,
241
, 155– 176.
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., Paustian, K., & Doran, J. W. (1998). Aggregation and
soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland
soils.
Soil Science Society American Journal
,
62
, 1367– 1377.
Sokol, N. W., Whalen, E. D., Jilling, A., Kallenbach, C., Pett- Ridge, J.,
& Georgiou, K. (2022). Global distribution, formation and fate of
mineral- associated soil organic matter under a changing climate: A
trait- based perspective.
Functional Ecology
,
36
, 1411– 1429.
13652486, 2023, 21, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.16921 by Hayley Peter-Contesse - Oregon State University , Wiley Online Library on [19/10/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License